git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix $((...)) coding style
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:27:49 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1602041619430.2964@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160204140609.GH29880@serenity.lan>

Hi John,

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, John Keeping wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:13:47PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Whatever the outcome, the inconsistency must be fixed.
> 
> I disagree.  Unless there are other changes in the same area, the noise
> isn't worth it.
> 
> However, I do think we need to agree on a policy so that new code can be
> consistent.  This should then be documented in CodingGuidelines.

If you want to enforce it in the future, how can you possibly be against
fixing the inconsistency in the existing code? Sorry, I am really unable
to understand this.

Also, we *did* document the policy in the CodingGuidelines:

	As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code

So. There you are. By that token, my patch series was the correct thing to
do because the first arithmetic expression introduced into a shell script
in Git's source code had no spaces.

At this point I am a bit fed up with the discussion because by now it
feels to me more like a Slashdot thread than a technical discussion with a
direction.

As far as technical direction goes, here is the summary of what I have to
say: I still think that the changes I submitted are good because they seem
to me to reinstate the coding style with which we started out.

And that's really all I have to say about this matter.

Ciao,
Johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 12:01 [PATCH 0/3] Fix $((...)) coding style Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] filter-branch: fix style of $((...) construct Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] rebase--interactive: adjust the coding style of $((...)) Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] rebase --merge: adjust $((...)) coding style Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 12:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix " John Keeping
2016-02-04 12:38   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 13:01     ` John Keeping
2016-02-04 13:13       ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 14:06         ` John Keeping
2016-02-04 15:27           ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-02-04 15:53             ` John Keeping
2016-02-04 19:43               ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-04 19:43               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1602041619430.2964@virtualbox \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=gitter.spiros@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).