From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] one ugly test to verify basic functionality Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:20:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1454662677-15137-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <1454662677-15137-9-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n_Th=C3=A1i_Ng=E1=BB=8Dc_Duy?= , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Elia Pinto X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 05 14:20:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgJa-00037B-Io for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:20:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753181AbcBENUm (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:20:42 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:61008 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753165AbcBENUl (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:20:41 -0500 Received: from virtualbox ([37.24.143.74]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LswqM-1a3wM90F6w-012c8l; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:20:39 +0100 X-X-Sender: virtualbox@virtualbox In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+xYufzSfQAYYa6+6BDiyXtUPDXhhT5Vw7CXzkYIbTVAaFjNGFYC Te5hP76AiMz5iO0niLuxmRVR9DGwi2D+Hb8M933SQ5k5KPJ1XNXfZLbQA7iitJS4PtmmCyG WAnzz9ZHaHLtWHJIo10g0MpIhNZkCI0SWEvrggBEFj3eThakQLJNxOverIEP1dHGayShEFC GXPJGQS2kCWR7rJonPVBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WFGCkP3Zt9Y=:HZQiDCkZ5pVCxClVU4qs3I dKZF7u77VaKNQyieSGEZouyEoD+PF9P5t46fxgyXGXZy8n/vpUsl+T2mYW/YlCgTSXSDC0Ng5 eRLKSMQmSrcdc8/mi9FAPdCfkEkfA1OiXtBCYEkTjitfrYyStcbzQTKZobAWgbrj8GsuoAfPo KLcuhEwMNTmV4czXJeEaA0VI8yjryW1xuet5tLFqaMMZLEgDzwzIUN5C1/8+wBJ4usdSJ5zQS SOOuJPVCSj5rzLCdjbv9hFJSfWCpcsIMz/v0MD5m+mxuUDY61mzV6gKqvQOZxAG7LM4e1AQv9 0HhaCW1JhxmxAQ40R+2SKypBlLH6mWBujsxEdee99VfnWhVK54UxJVQwLyVyVkOTL9mY7kneX ZJA9amvfN/pb4ItxeybLuD442VrpYAharCAiiGrsp4YydLAKeBhBn82SNECLf83o/qV0saMEX wlMSBxe2nOU4b34zygE1UxOddGfPQ6PRvluu5f5VnzL1S22koC/OoV0A0tPjE9r2lXV9Stopb aNpZbYrXR1rwKD7sSORVDm3Nr+uEuH6bopVE+4JaqMoxl/EsIAbQCD8A9dNmKbXWo6ADj9LsI kqBsBUjb15xii9xIjZMY+Me8ketxh66V9XBwzSAcCjaWrM94bhs67H+wjrI6YE4L8ExumDZef YXw6+JTtqwtGKwazuVYQtszRoMftwJrFMQeK4L+bi4040Rua6n3YLnBiXEOO4uUBqvKh9ea2m 7VCWOMPDiwY43A6ZeJ1fFQRnFM5JEFb+o8AcIbKSpr5Z9uWUkG9nBjkXdprVtTvpJwzzZjhC Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Elia, On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Elia Pinto wrote: > From the git coding guideline : "We prefer $( ... ) for command > substitution; unlike ``, it properly nests. It should have been the way > Bourne spelled it from day one, but unfortunately isn't." There was only one time in my life as a developer when I had to change a $(...) to a `...` construct. I do not really remember all the details, but I think it was on MacOSX, and it was inside a case ... esac and the closing parentheses was mistaken for a case arm (the $(...) construct might have been multi-line, is the only thing that would make sense in my mind. Did you hear of similar problems? Ciao, Dscho