From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: William Duclot <william.duclot@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>,
git@vger.kernel.org, simon.rabourg@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr,
francois.beutin@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr,
antoine.queru@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr,
matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] strbuf: allow to use preallocated memory
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41:54 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1605310822490.4449@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574CFF75.3090805@alum.mit.edu>
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 02:13 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> @@ -38,7 +67,11 @@ char *strbuf_detach(struct strbuf *sb, size_t *sz)
> >> {
> >> char *res;
> >> strbuf_grow(sb, 0);
> >> - res = sb->buf;
> >> + if (sb->flags & STRBUF_OWNS_MEMORY)
> >> + res = sb->buf;
> >> + else
> >> + res = xmemdupz(sb->buf, sb->alloc - 1);
> >
> > This looks like a usage to be avoided: if we plan to detach the buffer,
> > anyway, there is no good reason to allocate it on the heap first. I would
> > at least issue a warning here.
>
> I think this last case should be changed to
>
> res = xmemdupz(sb->buf, sb->len);
>
> Johannes, if this change is made then I think that there is a reasonable
> use case for calling `strbuf_detach()` on a strbuf that wraps a
> stack-allocated string, so I don't think that a warning is needed.
>
> I think this change makes sense. After all, once a caller detaches a
> string, it is probably not planning on growing/shrinking it anymore, so
> any more space than that would probably be wasted. In fact, since the
> caller has no way to ask how much extra space the detached string has
> allocated, it is almost guaranteed that the space would be wasted.
Ah, I did not think of that. (We could of course introduce
strbuf_realloc_snugly() or some such, but I agree: why?) So the best
counter-example to my objection might be something like this:
-- snip --
Subject: git_pathdup(): avoid realloc()
When generating Git paths, we already know the maximum length:
MAX_PATH. Let's avoid realloc()-caused fragmentation by using a
fixed buffer.
As a side effect, we avoid overallocating the end result, too:
previously, strbuf_detach() would not realloc() to avoid wasting
the (sb->alloc - sb->len) bytes, while it malloc()s the precisely
needed amount of memory when detaching fixed buffers.
diff --git a/path.c b/path.c
index 2511d8a..64fd3ee 100644
--- a/path.c
+++ b/path.c
@@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ const char *git_path(const char *fmt, ...)
char *git_pathdup(const char *fmt, ...)
{
- struct strbuf path = STRBUF_INIT;
+ char buffer[MAX_PATH];
+ struct strbuf path = STRBUF_WRAP_FIXED(buffer);
va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
do_git_path(&path, fmt, args);
-- snap --
Color me convinced,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 10:36 [PATCH 0/2] strbuf: improve API William Duclot
2016-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] strbuf: add tests William Duclot
2016-05-30 11:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-05-30 13:42 ` Simon Rabourg
2016-05-30 11:56 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-05-31 2:04 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-05-31 9:48 ` Simon Rabourg
2016-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] strbuf: allow to use preallocated memory William Duclot
2016-05-30 12:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-05-30 13:20 ` William Duclot
2016-05-31 6:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-05-31 3:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-05-31 6:41 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-05-31 8:25 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-05-30 12:52 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-05-30 14:15 ` William Duclot
2016-05-30 14:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-05-30 15:16 ` William Duclot
2016-05-31 4:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-05-31 15:59 ` William Duclot
2016-06-03 14:04 ` William Duclot
2016-05-30 21:56 ` Mike Hommey
2016-05-30 22:46 ` William Duclot
2016-05-30 22:50 ` Mike Hommey
2016-05-31 6:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-31 15:45 ` William
2016-05-31 15:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-05-31 16:08 ` William Duclot
2016-05-30 11:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] strbuf: improve API Remi Galan Alfonso
2016-06-01 7:42 ` Jeff King
2016-06-01 19:50 ` David Turner
2016-06-01 20:09 ` Jeff King
2016-06-01 20:22 ` David Turner
2016-06-01 21:07 ` Jeff King
2016-06-02 11:11 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-02 12:58 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-02 14:22 ` William Duclot
2016-06-24 17:20 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1605310822490.4449@virtualbox \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=antoine.queru@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=francois.beutin@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=simon.rabourg@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=william.duclot@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).