From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:04:11 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608051800190.5786@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803180820.2raazmsfjavoaogo@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more
> > > extensible. After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new
> > > rebase -i command that does nothing else than shelling out to a
> > > command.
> >
> > Yup, I tend to agree.
> >
> > Adding "sign" feature (i.e. make it pass -S to "commit [--amend]") may
> > be a good thing, but adding "sign" command to do so is not a great
> > design.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "feature" here, but it reminded me of
> Michael's proposal to allow options to todo lines:
>
> http://public-inbox.org/git/530DA00E.4090402@alum.mit.edu/
>
> which would allow:
>
> pick -S 1234abcd
>
> If that's what you meant, I think it is a good idea. :)
I looked at the code in git-rebase--interactive.sh again and stumbled over
something important: if you "pick" a commit, it *already* uses the
information provided to the rebase command via the -S option, *unless* the
pick fast-forwards.
That is, I came to believe that the "sign" command is unnecessary, and
that the --force-rebase option in conjunction with the -S option is what
should be used.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 8:47 [RFC/PATCH] rebase--interactive: Add "sign" command Chris Packham
2016-08-03 14:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-03 15:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-03 16:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-03 16:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-03 18:08 ` Jeff King
2016-08-04 0:53 ` Chris Packham
2016-08-04 16:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-05 16:04 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-08-04 0:41 ` Chris Packham
2016-08-03 15:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1608051800190.5786@virtualbox \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=judge.packham@gmail.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).