From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Dana How <danahow@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] prevent try_delta from using objects not in pack
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:59:39 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704060859230.28181@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b7f5510704052047r30166e53kffbdd8bf71885264@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Dana How wrote:
> Currently we have get_object_list -> traverse_commit_list ->
> show_{commit,object} -> add_object_entry , which is all
> called way before get_object_details -> check_object -> sha1_object_info .
> Can I safely move the sha1_object_info calll earlier into
> add_object_entry so I will know the size for pruning?
I think so, yes. And actually this call to sha1_object_info() has been
bothering me for a while.
There are currently two ways to get the list of objects to pack: one is
from stdin where objects are listed with their SHA1's, the other one
uses the internal revision walking code. In the later case we _already_
have the information that sha1_object_info() later provides making it
rather wasteful by forcing a second object header parsing.
However... aren't you more interested in the _compressed_ blob size than
its raw size?
> In your other email you mention memory consumption due to object_entry.
> This structure could benefit somewhat from some attention beyond removing
> my no_write.(e.g. int->short for .depth and .delta_limit; int->enum
> for .preferred_base). Perhaps for later.
Sure.
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-06 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 22:35 [PATCH 08/13] prevent try_delta from using objects not in pack Dana How
2007-04-05 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 1:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-06 2:28 ` Dana How
2007-04-06 3:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-06 3:47 ` Dana How
2007-04-06 14:59 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-04-06 18:17 ` Dana How
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0704060859230.28181@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@cam.org \
--cc=danahow@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).