git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Dana How <danahow@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] prevent try_delta from using objects not in pack
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:59:39 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704060859230.28181@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b7f5510704052047r30166e53kffbdd8bf71885264@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Dana How wrote:

> Currently we have get_object_list -> traverse_commit_list ->
> show_{commit,object} -> add_object_entry ,  which is all
> called way before get_object_details -> check_object -> sha1_object_info .
> Can I safely move the sha1_object_info calll earlier into
> add_object_entry so I will know the size for pruning?

I think so, yes.  And actually this call to sha1_object_info() has been 
bothering me for a while.

There are currently two ways to get the list of objects to pack: one is 
from stdin where objects are listed with their SHA1's, the other one 
uses the internal revision walking code.  In the later case we _already_ 
have the information that sha1_object_info() later provides making it 
rather wasteful by forcing a second object header parsing.

However... aren't you more interested in the _compressed_ blob size than 
its raw size?

> In your other email you mention memory consumption due to object_entry.
> This structure could benefit somewhat from some attention beyond removing
> my no_write.(e.g. int->short for .depth and .delta_limit; int->enum
> for .preferred_base).  Perhaps for later.

Sure.


Nicolas

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-06 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-05 22:35 [PATCH 08/13] prevent try_delta from using objects not in pack Dana How
2007-04-05 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06  1:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-06  2:28   ` Dana How
2007-04-06  3:27     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-06  3:47       ` Dana How
2007-04-06 14:59         ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-04-06 18:17           ` Dana How

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0704060859230.28181@xanadu.home \
    --to=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=danahow@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).