From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add keyword unexpansion support to convert.c Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <200704171041.46176.andyparkins@gmail.com> <"200704171803.58940.an dyparkins"@gmail.com> <200704172012.31280.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Andy Parkins , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano To: David Lang X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 17 22:29:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HduJG-0007tB-MM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:29:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161331AbXDQU3v (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161334AbXDQU3v (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:51 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:61115 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161331AbXDQU3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:50 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JGN00BA3SXPG930@VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:50 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, David Lang wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > I cannot do otherwise than ask at this point in the debate: why isn't > > the makefile rule sufficient for your needs? Why going through a > > complicated path that no one else will support due to its numerous > > pitfalls? > > not all uses of VCS's involve useing make Use perl then. Or a shell script. Or even a command.com batch script. Or your own tool. > > > That's just being obtuse - no other tool cares in the slightest about > > > the keywords, there are more "tools" in the world than just the VCS. > > > > ... which reinforces my question: why force a task on the VCS if it > > doesn't fit well with its fundamental design? > > becouse the VCS can do the job better then anything else? On what basis? > even if there are > limits to what the VCS can do. In the context of keyword expansion I don't agree at all with this statement. Git can *not* do better than an external tool and it has been demonstrated a few times already. Nicolas