From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Custom low-level merge driver support. Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <11768880622402-git-send-email-junkio@cox.net> <20070418153445.GC12888@admingilde.org> <7vslaxhamd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vzm55fqyv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vslaxfpvk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Waitz , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 18 21:43:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeG49-000616-6Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:43:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993097AbXDRTnh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993089AbXDRTnh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:43:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:43989 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993097AbXDRTnh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:43:37 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l3IJhNYC025916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:43:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3IJhMMh001260; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:43:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7vslaxfpvk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.968 required=5 tests=AWL,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.119__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.177 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > The syntax is a bit different from the one you came up in your > MUA. ..and I think yours is superior. Make it so. Linus