From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFH] WTF did we change in git-fsck recently? Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <7vps5ywouw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 21 03:24:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hf4LE-00089T-BC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:24:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754028AbXDUBYl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:24:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754034AbXDUBYl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:24:41 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:52640 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754028AbXDUBYl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:24:41 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l3L1OEgo020920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:24:15 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3L1ODQF028254; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:24:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7vps5ywouw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.544 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.12__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.177 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 65.172.181.25 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I noticed that "git-fsck --full" from 'master' takes forever to > fsck the kernel repository (I left it running for 2 hours before > killing it), while the one from 'maint' (or 1.5.1.1 which is > installed on kernel.org) finishes within 2 or 3 minutes. There > is some serious breakages there. Hmm. Probably something broken in my "object decorator" thing then. Will check it out, I hadn't noticed myself. Linus