From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Cc: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why SHA are 40 bytes? (aka looking for flames)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:27:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704220925420.28339@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5bfff550704211006t59cb49h179685d694a1d75a@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Marco Costalba wrote:
> On 4/21/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/21/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Well, why to store always the full length SHA?
> >
> > When Shawn gets done with full compression the SHAs would get stored
> > in the packfile once and then be replaced with a token generated from
> > the compression algorithm. Compression tokens are designed to use the
> > minimal number of bits depending on frequency of occurrence.
> >
>
> Currently in Lunux tree there are about 445.424 objects (git
> count-objects -v), if each object has his 40 bytes name it is about
> 20MB to store sha *once*, probably with no real disambiguate need to
> be that much.
Object names aren't 40 bytes. They are 20 bytes.
It is their hex representation that takes 40 bytes.
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-21 13:35 Why SHA are 40 bytes? (aka looking for flames) Marco Costalba
2007-04-21 15:08 ` Andy Parkins
2007-04-21 16:53 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-04-21 17:09 ` Marco Costalba
2007-04-21 16:58 ` Marco Costalba
2007-04-21 15:37 ` Jon Smirl
2007-04-21 17:06 ` Marco Costalba
2007-04-21 17:59 ` Jon Smirl
2007-04-21 18:28 ` Marco Costalba
2007-04-21 19:36 ` Jon Smirl
2007-04-24 14:48 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-04-24 15:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-24 15:18 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-04-24 16:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-22 13:27 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-04-24 0:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-24 2:30 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-24 2:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0704220925420.28339@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@cam.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=mcostalba@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).