From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add date format --local-zone Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1177482982542-git-send-email-junkio@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 25 17:22:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgjK9-0006p5-7I for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:22:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031053AbXDYPW0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:22:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031062AbXDYPW0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:22:26 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:49223 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031053AbXDYPWZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:22:25 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l3PFMLop030745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:22:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3PFMKLU005584; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:22:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.031 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED,PATCH_SUBJECT_OSDL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.12__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.177 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 65.172.181.25 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ie, it would be better, I think, to use a > > --date=local > --date=relative > --date=UTC > ... > > kind of syntax, than have each date flag be different ("--relative-date" > vs "--local-zone"?). Btw, when you do "--local-zone", you should drop the TZ printout too, I think. It doesn't seem to make any sense to give the *wrong* timezone. Linus