From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Dana How <danahow@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Lazily open pack index files on demand
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:41:38 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.99.0705271039170.3366@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b7f5510705262131g2d4186a0q605abbcea624d42d@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Dana How wrote:
> On 5/26/07, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
> > In other words, I think the naughty blob could simply be recognized as
> > such and be referenced in a special list instead of being written out
> > initially. Then when everything is believed to be written, the special
> > list can be walked to force write those naughty blob at last. No need
> > to modify the current object order.
> This works as long as a naughty blob can't be a delta base for a nice blob
> (causing it to be pushed out early by the recursion in write_one()).
> I think that's a reasonable and understandable restriction.
Sure. Or the delta can inherit the naughty property if its base is also
naughty, which solves the problem nicely.
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-27 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-26 5:24 [PATCH 1/3] Lazily open pack index files on demand Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-26 8:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-26 17:30 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-26 17:31 ` Dana How
2007-05-27 2:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-27 4:31 ` Dana How
2007-05-27 14:41 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-05-27 3:34 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-27 4:40 ` Dana How
2007-05-27 15:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-27 21:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-28 1:35 ` Dana How
2007-05-28 2:30 ` A Large Angry SCM
2007-05-28 18:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-28 2:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-27 15:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-27 16:06 ` Dana How
2007-05-27 21:52 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-27 23:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-28 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-28 17:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-28 17:40 ` Karl Hasselström
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-27 10:46 Martin Koegler
2007-05-27 15:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-29 0:09 linux
2007-05-29 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.99.0705271039170.3366@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@cam.org \
--cc=danahow@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).