From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce light weight commit annotations Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, Johan Herland To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 11 04:09:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HxZLW-0007J7-J9 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:09:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762209AbXFKCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:09:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762600AbXFKCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:09:23 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:36163 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762209AbXFKCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:09:23 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JJG00CTU8NGIRH0@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:09:16 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > The annotations are tracked in a new ref, refs/annotations/commits, > in the same fan-out style as .git/objects/??/*, only that they only > exist in the object database now. Isn't this abusing the refs namespace a bit? Why not .git/annotations/... instead? Nicolas