From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per-path attribute based hunk header selection. Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:22:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <7vejjnhpap.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwsxfe96i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlkdve93o.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v8x9uexji.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v8x9tdlbv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Linus Torvalds , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 09 05:22:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I7jpv-0000ZX-34 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:22:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758452AbXGIDWn (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:22:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758057AbXGIDWn (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:22:43 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:45340 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757495AbXGIDWm (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:22:42 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKW00I5Q6PT4O40@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:22:41 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <7v8x9tdlbv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > About the comment from Johannes regarding hunk_header vs > funcname, I would actually prefer hunk_header, since that is > what this is about ("funcname" and "find_func" were misnomer > from the beginning), but I'd rename hunk_header to funcname for > the sake of consistency and minimizing the diff. I think "minimizing the diff" in this case is a bad reason. Using hunk_header is so much better than funcname IMHO. Nicolas