From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'? Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <18071.19489.6733.665052@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Paul Mackerras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 13 19:37:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I9P4w-0000Xz-Ps for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:37:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757143AbXGMRhR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:37:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757316AbXGMRhQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:37:16 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:41365 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757143AbXGMRhO (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:37:14 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6DHaVXK012075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:36:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6DHaQ7O007944; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:36:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <18071.19489.6733.665052@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.611 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.12__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.181 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Try this, let me know what you think. I called the changes in the > working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index" > and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but > not committed". ACK. This matches exactly what I was thinking of. The red vs magenta looks a bit too close in color for me (red, green and blue?), but quite frankly, it's not like I really care. Those author/date fields look really empty, but that's probably a good way to emphasize that they aren't real commits, so while it's visually a bit strange, it probably is the right thing to do. Linus