From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Empty directories... Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <85lkdezi08.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <858x9ez1li.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85644hxujp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthieu Moy , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 18 23:46:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IBHLq-00024d-Ch for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:46:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756945AbXGRVqT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:46:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756424AbXGRVqT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:46:19 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:50376 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755639AbXGRVqT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:46:19 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6ILjCl1007665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:45:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6ILj6Ea030617; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:45:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <85644hxujp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.674 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.12__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.181 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, David Kastrup wrote: > > You said that you are not inclined to do any work in that area > since it does not touch _your_ use cases (well, at least not to a > degree that you consider worth bothering about) but that is no reason > to get into ridiculous arguments about other usage. How hard is it for you to admit that I also said "please send in a patch". I don't need it. You do. You do the work. I'm just explaining why the work hasn't been done. Linus