From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:28:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <11848281302504-git-send-email-aroben@apple.com> <200707191148.46228.andyparkins@gmail.com> <200707191523.42086.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Adam Roben , Junio C Hamano To: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 19 21:29:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IBbhA-0007tW-A2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:29:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S940265AbXGST3A (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:29:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S939694AbXGST26 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:28:58 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:59072 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S939236AbXGST2z (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:28:55 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JLF00EUAY453M30@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:28:54 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <200707191523.42086.andyparkins@gmail.com> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Thursday 2007 July 19, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > And how would having "core.pager" but "porcelain.editor" be easier to > > remember? Nah, not really. > > If there is no difference, then do you object so strongly? If anything I think it is core.pager which is a misnommer. A pager is certainly more porcelainish. by nature. Given that core.pager already exists, I think it would be yet another mistake to put editor in a different section separate from pager. IMHO both of them should have been user.pager and user.editor. Nicolas