From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Git tree for old kernels from before the current tree Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <9e4733910707221349s462aa11bj714956f7cdc72aac@mail.gmail.com> <20070722211314.GA13850@linux-sh.org> <46A3D5EA.2050600@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Paul Mundt , Jon Smirl , Git Mailing List , lkml To: "H. Peter Anvin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 23 18:56:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ID1Ce-0005MK-VZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:56:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753443AbXGWQzl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:55:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753809AbXGWQzk (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:55:40 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:35377 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753443AbXGWQzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:55:39 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6NGtU5Z011986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:55:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6NGtOBU001690; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:55:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <46A3D5EA.2050600@zytor.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.723 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.12__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.181 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Wouldn't be hard to make a git tree with all the patches all the way > back to 0.01 even... I actually tried to get something like this together back in the BK days and early in the SCO saga. It was pretty painful to try to find all the historic trees and patches - they're all in different format, and some of them are unreliable (ie CVS imports by people like Ted). The good news is that git would be a lot more natural to the process of trying to create a history, because you could basically import random trees, and tag them as just independent trees, and then re-create the history after-the-fact by trying to stitch them all together. And if you find a new tree, you'd just re-stitch it - something that was very hard to do with BK (and BK generally wouldn't help you with keeping multiple independent trees around, and wouldn't generally accept the notion of re-doing the histories and keeping various versions of the histories around). So I've been thinking about trying to re-create some really old history into git, but it's still a lot of work.. And obviously not very useful, just interesting from an archeological standpoint. Linus