From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Efficient way to import snapshots? Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070730180710.GA64467@nowhere> <20070730192922.GB64467@nowhere> <7vy7gximkc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Craig Boston , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 31 01:27:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IFeeV-0002kt-Rk for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:27:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760204AbXG3X1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:27:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760058AbXG3X1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:27:49 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:35157 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755952AbXG3X1s (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:27:48 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6UNReoC001493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:27:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l6UNRZdS003995; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:27:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7vy7gximkc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.729 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.16__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.181 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > We would need to do something like this patch, perhaps? This > function has three callers, two in builtin-add and another in > builtin-mv. I think you need to check that ce is in stage 0 too. Linus