From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects'
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:45:31 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710182238470.19446@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071019021255.GD3290@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:45:27PM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
> > Recently I was referred to the Grammar Police as the git-pack-objects
> > progress message 'Deltifying %u objects' is considered to be not
> > proper English to at least some small but vocal segment of the
> > English speaking population. Techncially we are applying delta
> > compression to these objects at this stage, so the new term is
> > slightly more acceptable to the Grammar Police but is also just
> > as correct.
>
> Boo. I _like_ "deltifying". Sure, it's probably not in the dictionary,
> but that's how languages change: saying "delta compressing" all the time
> will get awkward, so people invent a new word using existing rules to
> explain a common phenomenon.
Yet that progress display isn't solely about "delta compressing". It
also includes the search for best object match in order to keep the
smallest delta possible.
I'd like to add my own boo, but since I'm not a native speaker I won't
argue too much.
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-19 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 0:45 [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects' Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 2:12 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 2:19 ` Sam Vilain
2007-10-19 2:24 ` David Symonds
2007-10-19 2:34 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 3:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 2:36 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 2:55 ` Sam Vilain
2007-10-19 2:25 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 2:21 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 2:34 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 2:47 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 3:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:07 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 3:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:32 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 3:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:56 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 4:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 4:29 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 11:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 5:09 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 3:33 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 5:03 ` [PATCH] Stop displaying "Pack pack-$ID created." during git-gc Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 2:49 ` [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects' Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 3:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:41 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 3:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 4:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 11:44 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-19 2:45 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-10-19 2:59 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 3:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 3:15 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 3:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710182238470.19446@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@cam.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).