From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Adding Git to Better SCM Initiative : Comparison Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:38:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <200712101357.49325.jnareb@gmail.com> <87ve76mwos.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Weimer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 10 17:39:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1lf8-0006Tp-Hp for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:39:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753231AbXLJQiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:38:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752971AbXLJQiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:38:46 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:39454 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753194AbXLJQip (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:38:45 -0500 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id lBAGcYf5002390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:38:35 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id lBAGcX6q009980; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:38:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87ve76mwos.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.722 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jakub Narebski: > > > + > > + Yes (or no depending on interpretation). Git > > This should be "No." (same for copies below). No. Git handles renames and copies better than most SCM's that _claim_ to handle them. Saying we don't do them is just stupid. We do them *right*. The fact that inferior systems do it differently is _their_ problem, and not a cause for saying that git wouldn't do them. Linus