git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:30:19 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.99999.0711261417580.9605@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <858x4l2apc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Kastrup wrote:

> Get rid of plumbing at the command line level.

We can't get rid of plumbing.  It is part of Git probably forever and is 
really really convenient for scripting in any language you want.  

The only valid argument IMHO is the way too large number of Git commands 
directly available from the cmdline.

The solution: make purely plumbing commands _not_ directly available 
from the command line. Instead, they can be available through 'git 
lowlevel <blah>' instead of 'git <blah>' and only 'git lowlevel' would 
stand in your shell default path.

Such a scheme can be implemented in parallel with the current one for a 
release while the direct plumbing commands are deprecated in order to 
give script authors a transition period to fix their code.


Nicolas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-25 21:48 If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? Jakub Narebski
2007-11-25 22:23 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-26  1:28   ` Steven Walter
2007-11-26  6:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-26  6:36       ` Adam Roben
2007-11-26 15:32         ` Carlos Rica
2007-11-26 16:40           ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-11-26 16:46 ` Andy Parkins
2007-11-26 17:10   ` Benoit Sigoure
2007-11-26 18:56     ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 19:12       ` David Kastrup
2007-11-26 19:34         ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 19:50           ` Michael Poole
2007-11-26 20:09             ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 20:31               ` Michael Poole
2007-11-26 20:48                 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-26 20:11     ` Andy Parkins
2007-11-26 19:25   ` Marco Costalba
2007-11-27  1:20     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27  1:46       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-27  1:58         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27 11:39           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-27 23:59             ` [RFC] git-gui USer's Survey 2007 (was: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?) Jakub Narebski
2007-11-28 12:32               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-28 15:48                 ` Jason Sewall
2007-11-28 23:25                 ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-28 23:48                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-29  6:57                     ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-29 12:01                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-30 17:50                         ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-30 18:25                           ` Marco Costalba
2007-12-01  2:35                           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-12-01  2:53                             ` Marco Costalba
2007-11-28 13:18               ` [RFC] git-gui USer's Survey 2007 Sergei Organov
2007-11-27  8:45     ` If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? Andy Parkins
2007-11-27 13:15       ` Marco Costalba
2007-11-27 23:56         ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-27 17:48       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-04 11:00         ` Andy Parkins
2007-11-27 17:33   ` Jing Xue
2007-11-26 16:48 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-26 17:11 ` David Kastrup
2007-11-26 19:27   ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 20:11     ` Benoit Sigoure
2007-11-26 20:36       ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 19:30   ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2007-11-26 19:34     ` David Kastrup
2007-11-26 19:57       ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 20:35         ` David Kastrup
2007-11-26 21:00           ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-26 21:28           ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 20:45         ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-11-26 21:24           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-26 21:35             ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 21:47               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-26 22:03                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-27  1:03             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27  3:35               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-27  5:10                 ` Steven Grimm
2007-11-26 21:27     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-26 21:39       ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 21:40         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-27 14:11     ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-11-27 14:38       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-26 19:18 ` Dana How
2007-11-26 19:52   ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 20:17     ` Dana How
2007-11-26 20:55       ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 22:02         ` Dana How
2007-11-26 22:22           ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-26 20:17   ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-26 20:36     ` Dana How
2007-11-27  1:25   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27  5:07     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-27  1:48 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27  1:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-27  1:59     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27  2:15       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-27 11:47         ` C# binding, was " Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-27  4:58   ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-27  5:59     ` Dana How
2007-11-27  6:12       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-11-27 16:33     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.99999.0711261417580.9605@xanadu.home \
    --to=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).