From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Applying patches from gmane can be dangerous. Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:29:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20080205211044.GP26392@lavos.net> <7vodatqu6w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Brian Downing , Johannes Schindelin , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 07 05:29:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMyOS-0006iC-9E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:29:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755561AbYBGE3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:29:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756049AbYBGE3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:29:14 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:28425 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755786AbYBGE3N (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:29:13 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JVU0081VPSOK6C0@VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:29:12 -0500 (EST) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <7vodatqu6w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I picked up the qsort patch from Brian while reading the list > via gmane's newsfeed and applied it without realizing that it > was one of the articles whose addresses on all the address > header fields _and_ all strings that look like e-mail addresses > have been mangled by gmane. Sign-offs by Dscho and Steffen > Prohaska have also been munged (even though that are not part of > headers). > > It already is part of 'next', and we have the policy of not > rewinding 'next', so the record of this mistake will > unfortunately be with us forever. Sorry, Brian, Dscho and > Steffen. Maybe you can make an exception for this time? A single Nicolas