From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] Preventing corrupt objects from entering the repository Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20080210175812.GB12162@auto.tuwien.ac.at> <7vmyq8cqfn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080211195623.GA21878@auto.tuwien.ac.at> <20080211215806.GA24971@auto.tuwien.ac.at> <20080212190411.GA23837@auto.tuwien.ac.at> <20080212213858.GA29151@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Koegler X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 12 22:52:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JP32r-0006pv-4r for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:52:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751746AbYBLVv0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751503AbYBLVv0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:26 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:62181 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751205AbYBLVvZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:25 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JW5009ZYBDCC761@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:14 -0500 (EST) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <20080212213858.GA29151@auto.tuwien.ac.at> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Martin Koegler wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:22:17PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Martin Koegler wrote: > > > We will need some additional memory for struct blob/tree/tag/commit > > > even for this check. > > > > Why so? > > > > Each received object is stored in memory when received, so why can't you > > simply validate it in place? No need to keep trace of them afterward. > > Freeing the data is not my problem. Well, I would say it is now. ;-) > Many validations are in parse_XXX_buffer, which are also used by > fsck. This returns a struct commit/tree/tag/blob. > > I have not found any code in git to free them. Maybe we should add it then. Especially in the usual case where we want incoming objects to be validated. > Same for pack-objects, e.g. add_objects_in_unpacked_packs allocates > many struct object via lookup_unknown_object. As far as I understand > the code, they are never freed, even if they are not needed later. Hmmm, that's bad. Nicolas