From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: cvs diff -l equivalent? Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20080730082030.GA12555@cuci.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 30 23:30:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOJF6-0005MS-Kl for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:29:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753296AbYG3V2w (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753482AbYG3V2v (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:51 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56796 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751929AbYG3V2u (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:50 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m6ULSMcq002297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:28:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m6ULSLcB018130; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:28:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080730082030.GA12555@cuci.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.41 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > Someone popped this question on me. The closest I got was: > > git diff . > > But that still recurses. Any solutions without patching? Not without patching, no. When generating a patch, git diff always recurses. I suspect adding some kind of "-l" flag would be about five lines of code, though, so if you really need it... Hint, hint. Linus