From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Monotone workflow compared to Git workflow ( was RE: Git vs Monotone) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F79430238A5EE@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> <20080801025024.GA18529@anvil.corenet.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Craig L. Ching" , sverre@rabbelier.nl, Git Mailinglist To: Dmitry Torokhov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 01 05:07:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOkyq-0004AE-Us for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:07:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753337AbYHADF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:05:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753232AbYHADF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:05:59 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47707 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751304AbYHADF6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:05:58 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m7135qar022350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:05:53 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m7135piS025886; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:05:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080801025024.GA18529@anvil.corenet.prv> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.405 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > For example, for the kernel, I can literally rebuild my whole kernel > > (which is just what I use on _that_ machine) in about 16 seconds. This is > > _not_ using ccache or anything else - it's rebuilding the whole tree with > > -j16. > > Is it after make mrproper (wow)? Yeah. It's after doing git clean -dqfx make oldconfig where I tend to use "git clean -dqfx" instead of "make mrproper" these days. Note that my "oldconfig" really only does the things I need, so this is _not_ a "allmodconfig" or anything like that. That would take much longer. It only has the drivers I use, and the stuff I actually need (it's not a embedded kernel in any way, but it's definitely pared down config exactly because I like being able to rebuild my kernels without wasting time on thousands of drivers that I can't use anyway). Other people can do the "does it compile?" testing. Not worth my time, I feel ;) > Because for me (and well, I dont have that beefy boxes as you do) > swithing between "for-linus" and "next" that based off a revision in > vicinity of 2.6.xx-rc1 and "work" which tracks the tip of your tree > takes time to rebuild. Well, the difference really is the beefy box. And the fact that I hate modules, and I hate building stuff that I don't actually need. I literally turn off CONFIG_MODULES entirely. Linus