From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: pack operation is thrashing my server Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20080811030444.GC27195@spearce.org> <87vdy71i6w.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1EE44425-6910-4C37-9242-54D0078FC377@adacore.com> <20080813031503.GC5855@spearce.org> <70550C21-8358-4BEF-A7BA-3A41C1ACB346@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , Andi Kleen , Ken Pratt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Bosch X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 13 16:39:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTHV6-0004xI-Ay for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:39:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752688AbYHMOh4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752155AbYHMOh4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:56 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:34251 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751486AbYHMOh4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:56 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K5J00LXSNB2WP40@VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:50 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <70550C21-8358-4BEF-A7BA-3A41C1ACB346@adacore.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Geert Bosch wrote: > One nice optimization we could do for those pesky binary large objects > (like PDF, JPG and GZIP-ed data), is to detect such files and revert > to compression level 0. This should be especially beneficial > since already compressed data takes most time to compress again. That would be a good thing indeed. Nicolas