From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: pack operation is thrashing my server Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:01:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20080811030444.GC27195@spearce.org> <87vdy71i6w.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1EE44425-6910-4C37-9242-54D0078FC377@adacore.com> <20080813145944.GB3782@spearce.org> <20080813155016.GD3782@spearce.org> <48A3D1D7.5030805@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , Geert Bosch , Andi Kleen , Ken Pratt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 14 16:02:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTdPA-00039x-NW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:02:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754038AbYHNOBP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:01:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752675AbYHNOBO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:01:14 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:33897 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751152AbYHNOBM (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:01:12 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K5L00DEBG9SNILE@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:01:04 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <48A3D1D7.5030805@op5.se> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > As a corporate git user, I can say that I'm very rarely worried > about how much data gets sent over our in-office gigabit network. > My primary concern wrt server side git is cpu- and IO-heavy > operations, as we run the entire machine in a vmware guest os > which just plain sucks at such things. In the general case, the amount of data sent over the network is directly proportional to disk IO. Nicolas