From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Geert Bosch <bosch@adacore.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Ken Pratt <ken@kenpratt.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pack operation is thrashing my server
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:21:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808141014410.3324@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808131228270.4352@xanadu.home>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> A much better solution would consist of finding just _why_ object
> enumeration is so slow. This is indeed my biggest grip with git
> performance at the moment.
>
> |nico@xanadu:linux-2.6> time git rev-list --objects --all > /dev/null
> |
> |real 0m21.742s
> |user 0m21.379s
> |sys 0m0.360s
>
> That's way too long for 1030198 objects (roughly 48k objects/sec).
Why do you think that's horribly slow?
Doing a rev-list of all objects is a fairly rare operation, but even if
you want to clone/repack all of your archives the whole time, please
realize that listing objects is _not_ a simple operation. It opens up and
parses every single tree in the whole history. That's a _lot_ of data to
unpack.
And trees also pack very efficiently (because they delta so well), so
there's a lot of complex ops there.
> And it gets even worse with the gcc repository:
I bet it's because gcc has a different directory structure. I don't have
the gcc sources in front of me, but I'd suspect something like a single
large directory or other.
> Clearly something is not scaling here.
I don't agree. There's no "clearly" about it. Different data sets.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-14 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-10 19:47 pack operation is thrashing my server Ken Pratt
2008-08-10 23:06 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-08-10 23:12 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-10 23:30 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-08-10 23:34 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-11 3:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 7:43 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-11 15:01 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 15:40 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-08-11 15:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 19:13 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-11 19:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 19:15 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-13 2:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 2:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-13 2:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 19:22 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 19:29 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-11 19:34 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-11 20:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-13 3:12 ` Geert Bosch
2008-08-13 3:15 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-13 3:58 ` Geert Bosch
2008-08-13 14:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 14:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-13 15:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-13 15:26 ` David Tweed
2008-08-13 23:54 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-08-14 9:04 ` David Tweed
2008-08-13 16:10 ` Johan Herland
2008-08-13 17:38 ` Ken Pratt
2008-08-13 17:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 14:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 14:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-13 15:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 15:50 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-13 17:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 17:19 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-14 6:33 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-08-14 10:04 ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-14 10:15 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-08-14 22:33 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-15 1:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-14 14:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-14 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-08-14 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-14 19:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-14 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-14 21:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-15 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-14 21:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-14 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-14 23:39 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-15 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-15 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-16 12:47 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-16 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-07 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 2:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-07 17:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-09-07 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-07 2:50 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-07 3:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 3:43 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-07 4:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 13:58 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-07 17:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-09-07 20:33 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-08 14:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-09-08 15:12 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-08 16:01 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-07 8:18 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07 7:45 ` Mike Hommey
2008-08-14 18:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-14 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 16:01 ` Geert Bosch
2008-08-13 17:13 ` Dana How
2008-08-13 17:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-08-13 12:43 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0808141014410.3324@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bosch@adacore.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ken@kenpratt.net \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).