From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: libgit2 - a true git library Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20081031170704.GU14786@spearce.org> <20081031174745.GA4058@artemis.corp> <7viqr873x7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20081031234115.GD14786@spearce.org> <20081101010011.GG14786@spearce.org> <20081101010824.GE29036@artemis.corp> <20081101013815.GF29036@artemis.corp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: david@lang.hm, "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre Habouzit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 01 02:51:16 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kw5dy-0001EQ-Sa for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:51:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751876AbYKABt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:49:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751479AbYKABt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:49:57 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:40089 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbYKABt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:49:57 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K9M00MWGT20HR30@VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:49:12 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <20081101013815.GF29036@artemis.corp> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:33:51AM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > OTOH they would certainly come out clean if the license was BSD since > > the spirit of that license explicitly allows closing up the whole > > library and adding extra features. > > I think it's pretty clear most contributor from git.git would be driven > away if the license isn't GPLish. So I was basing my answer on a > supposition it would be. Sure. My point is the difference in guiltiness. Even if a LGPL license doesn't prevent all abuses, it at least allows for public denunciations at the very least. Nicolas