From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:49:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <4A8A552D.6020407@viscovery.net> <4A8A8661.5060908@gmail.com> <4A8AA511.1060205@gmail.com> <7v4os5gs0p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vpratdpc8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vprasc1vu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v7hx0c1at.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Sebastian Schuberth , Artur Skawina , Johannes Sixt , msysGit , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 18 22:50:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MdVcz-0006TM-1X for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:49:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751643AbZHRUts (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:49:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751261AbZHRUts (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:49:48 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:14279 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751222AbZHRUts (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:49:48 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.130.28.92]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KOL005SEB6V4G00@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:49:44 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <7v7hx0c1at.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Meh, our mails crossed. I'll chuck this one and use your > > [PATCH] make sure byte swapping is optimal for git > > patch. Do you want default_swab32 be mmoved inside the > > #if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) > > block? Not necessarily. It is generic code that other compilers/architectures might use as well. Nicolas