From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Enumerating all objects in the Git object store Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:24:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <4BACD86E.4020803@viscovery.net> <201003262111.48298.j.sixt@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_bgpqf+If1TxhwMW/lgQ0tQ)" Cc: Paul Richards , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 26 21:24:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvG54-0005ul-4u for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:24:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752492Ab0CZUY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:24:29 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:27111 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752446Ab0CZUY2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:24:28 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.130.28.92]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KZW005ADOO9WBJ0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:24:09 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <201003262111.48298.j.sixt@viscovery.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --Boundary_(ID_bgpqf+If1TxhwMW/lgQ0tQ) Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Johannes Sixt wrote: > On Freitag, 26. März 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > Use 'git rev-list --objects --all' to find all objects connected to all > > > refs (use something else than --all if you want to). Do *not* look at the > > > path that the tree and blob objects have attached - it is not authorative > > > information. > > > > Really?? > > Yes, really. Consider the same content at two differen paths. Now what? > rev-list will only ever list the object once. Sure. It is still a valid path though. Nicolas --Boundary_(ID_bgpqf+If1TxhwMW/lgQ0tQ)--