From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Why is "git tag --contains" so slow? Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:10:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20100701121711.GF1333@thunk.org> <201007082320.05017.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_D+gKY5/03232s76z3lBg/g)" Cc: Jakub Narebski , Avery Pennarun , Theodore Tso , Jeff King , Will Palmer , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 09 01:10:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OX0Ev-0001JO-Vm for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:10:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758712Ab0GHXKl (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:10:41 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:59920 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756762Ab0GHXKk (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:10:40 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.130.28.92]) by VL-MR-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L59003YNHPRB6A0@VL-MR-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:10:40 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --Boundary_(ID_D+gKY5/03232s76z3lBg/g) Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > Heya, > > 2010/7/8 Jakub Narebski : > > By the way, rev-cache project was started mainly to make "counting > > objects" part of clone / fetch faster.  Would pack v4 offer the same > > without rev-cache? > > Speaking of pack v4 features... > > I remember from GitTogether08 that one hope was that the metadata > would be in a different file, such that it could be retrieved > separately (allowing shallow clones to create and push new commits). > Is this not something that is part of the design goals for packv4? No. And I don't see why a pack format change would need to be involved either. Nicolas --Boundary_(ID_D+gKY5/03232s76z3lBg/g)--