From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue of 'git branch'
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:51:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907221742010.3352@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907221714300.3352@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Try this:
>
> git pack-refs --all
>
> rmdir .git/refs/heads
> rmdir .git/refs/tags
>
> mkdir .git/refs/heads
> mkdir .git/refs/tags
>
> and see if it magically speeds up.
In fact, you could also just try
mv .git/refs .git/temp-refs &&
cp -a .git/temp-refs .git/refs &&
rm -rf .git/temp-refs
which will re-create other subdirectories too (like .git/refs/remotes
etc).
Of course, depending on your particular filesystem, a better fix might be
to enable filename hashing, which gets rid of the whole "look through all
the old empty stale directory entries to see if there's a filename there"
issue. That won't fix 'readdir()' performance, but it should fix your
insane 4-second lstat() thing.
If you have ext3, you'd do something like
tune2fs -O dir_index /dev/<node-of-your-filesystem-goes-here>
but as mentioned, even with directory indexing it can actually make sense
to recreate directories that at some point _used_ to be large, but got
shrunk down to something much smaller. It's a generic directory problem
(not just ext3, not just unix, it's a common issue across filesystems.
It's not _universal_ - some smarter filesystems really do shrink their
directories - but it's certainly not unusual).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-23 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 23:59 Performance issue of 'git branch' Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-07-23 0:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 2:02 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 2:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 12:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-23 14:45 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 1:22 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 3:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 3:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 17:47 ` Tony Finch
2009-07-23 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 22:48 ` Newton-Raphson, was " Tony Finch
2009-07-23 23:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23 23:50 ` Tony Finch
2009-07-24 0:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23 3:18 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:27 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:40 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 4:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 5:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 5:17 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 4:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 5:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 6:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:53 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:55 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-24 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:18 ` david
2009-07-24 22:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:46 ` david
2009-07-25 2:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 2:53 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-08-07 4:21 ` Jeff King
2009-07-24 22:54 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-24 22:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-07-24 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-26 17:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-26 17:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-24 23:46 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25 0:41 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 18:57 ` Timo Hirvonen
2009-07-25 19:06 ` Reece Dunn
2009-07-25 20:31 ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-25 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 23:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-26 16:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-26 7:54 ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-26 10:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26 10:23 ` demerphq
2009-07-26 10:27 ` demerphq
2009-07-25 21:04 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:48 ` Anders Kaseorg
2009-07-23 19:03 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 0:23 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-07-23 2:25 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-26 23:21 George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0907221742010.3352@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=crmafra2@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).