Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance issue of 'git branch'
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907251046140.3960@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090725004122.GA28477@Pilar.aei.mpg.de>



On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> 
> Ok, so I killed /usr/sbin/preload and did the tests again. The 
> results were much more stable, with average 0.40 vs 0.79
> (NO_CURL=1 being faster). The pagefaults were pretty stable too,
> (40major+654minor vs 12major+401minor). 
> 
> I will use NO_CURL=1 from now on!

I actually find it interesting that this whole NO_CURL issue is actually a 
lot more noticeable for me in the hot-cache case than all the other 'git 
branch' issues were.

I went back to a version a few days ago (before all the optimizations), 
and on my machine with a hot cache I get (for my kernel repo - I don't 
use branches there, but I have an old 'akpm' branch for taking a emailed 
patch series from Andrew):

	[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
	  akpm
	* master

	real	0m0.005s
	user	0m0.004s
	sys	0m0.000s

so it's five milliseconds. Big deal, fast enough, right?

Ok, so fast-forward to today, with the optimizations to builtin-branch.c:

	[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
	  akpm
	* master

	real	0m0.004s
	user	0m0.000s
	sys	0m0.004s

Woot! I shaved a millisecond off it by avoiding all those page faults and 
object lookups. Good, but hey, all that unnecessary lookup was just a 25% 
cost.

So let's build it with NO_CURL:

	[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
	  akpm
	* master

	real	0m0.002s
	user	0m0.000s
	sys	0m0.000s

Heh. The whole NO_CURL=1 thing is actually a _bigger_ optimization than 
anything else I did to git-branch. Cost of curl: 100%.

The difference in number of system calls and page faults is really quite 
staggering. System calls: 397->184, page faults: 619->293. Just from not 
doing that curl loading. No wonder performance actually doubles.

Now, I admit that 5ms vs 2ms probably doesn't really matter much, but 
dang, performance was a primary goal in git, so I'm a bit upset at how bad 
curl screwed us. Plus those things do add up when scripting things, and 
those 300+ page faults are basically true for _all_ git programs.

So it's not just 'git branch': doing 'git show' shows the exact same 
thing: 6ms -> 4ms, 448->235 system calls, and 1549->1176 page faults.

So curl really must die. It may not matter for the expensive operations, 
but a lot of scripting is about running all those "cheap" things that just 
add up over time.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-25 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-22 23:59 Performance issue of 'git branch' Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  0:51   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  0:55     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  2:02       ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  2:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 12:42           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-23 14:45             ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  1:22   ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  2:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  2:23       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  3:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  3:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 17:47             ` Tony Finch
2009-07-23 18:57               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 22:48                 ` Newton-Raphson, was " Tony Finch
2009-07-23 23:24                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23 23:50                     ` Tony Finch
2009-07-24  0:43                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23  3:18         ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  3:27           ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  3:40           ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  3:47           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  4:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  5:13               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23  5:17               ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  4:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23  5:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  5:52             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23  6:04               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 17:19                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:07           ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:19             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:53               ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 19:05                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:13                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:55                     ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-24 20:36                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 20:47                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 21:21                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:13                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:18                               ` david
2009-07-24 22:42                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:46                                   ` david
2009-07-25  2:39                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25  2:53                                       ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-08-07  4:21                               ` Jeff King
2009-07-24 22:54                             ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-24 22:59                               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-07-24 23:28                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-26 17:07                                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-26 17:16                                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-24 23:46                             ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25  0:41                               ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25 18:04                                 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-07-25 18:57                                   ` Timo Hirvonen
2009-07-25 19:06                                     ` Reece Dunn
2009-07-25 20:31                                     ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-25 21:02                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 21:13                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 23:23                                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26  4:49                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-26 16:29                                               ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-26  7:54                                         ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-26 10:16                                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26 10:23                                             ` demerphq
2009-07-26 10:27                                               ` demerphq
2009-07-25 21:04                                     ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:48         ` Anders Kaseorg
2009-07-23 19:03           ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23  0:23 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-07-23  2:25   ` Carlos R. Mafra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-26 23:21 George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0907251046140.3960@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=crmafra2@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox