From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance issue of 'git branch'
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907251046140.3960@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090725004122.GA28477@Pilar.aei.mpg.de>
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> Ok, so I killed /usr/sbin/preload and did the tests again. The
> results were much more stable, with average 0.40 vs 0.79
> (NO_CURL=1 being faster). The pagefaults were pretty stable too,
> (40major+654minor vs 12major+401minor).
>
> I will use NO_CURL=1 from now on!
I actually find it interesting that this whole NO_CURL issue is actually a
lot more noticeable for me in the hot-cache case than all the other 'git
branch' issues were.
I went back to a version a few days ago (before all the optimizations),
and on my machine with a hot cache I get (for my kernel repo - I don't
use branches there, but I have an old 'akpm' branch for taking a emailed
patch series from Andrew):
[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
akpm
* master
real 0m0.005s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.000s
so it's five milliseconds. Big deal, fast enough, right?
Ok, so fast-forward to today, with the optimizations to builtin-branch.c:
[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
akpm
* master
real 0m0.004s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.004s
Woot! I shaved a millisecond off it by avoiding all those page faults and
object lookups. Good, but hey, all that unnecessary lookup was just a 25%
cost.
So let's build it with NO_CURL:
[torvalds@nehalem linux]$ time ~/git/git branch
akpm
* master
real 0m0.002s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
Heh. The whole NO_CURL=1 thing is actually a _bigger_ optimization than
anything else I did to git-branch. Cost of curl: 100%.
The difference in number of system calls and page faults is really quite
staggering. System calls: 397->184, page faults: 619->293. Just from not
doing that curl loading. No wonder performance actually doubles.
Now, I admit that 5ms vs 2ms probably doesn't really matter much, but
dang, performance was a primary goal in git, so I'm a bit upset at how bad
curl screwed us. Plus those things do add up when scripting things, and
those 300+ page faults are basically true for _all_ git programs.
So it's not just 'git branch': doing 'git show' shows the exact same
thing: 6ms -> 4ms, 448->235 system calls, and 1549->1176 page faults.
So curl really must die. It may not matter for the expensive operations,
but a lot of scripting is about running all those "cheap" things that just
add up over time.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-25 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 23:59 Performance issue of 'git branch' Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 0:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 2:02 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 2:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 12:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-23 14:45 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 1:22 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 3:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 3:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 17:47 ` Tony Finch
2009-07-23 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 22:48 ` Newton-Raphson, was " Tony Finch
2009-07-23 23:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23 23:50 ` Tony Finch
2009-07-24 0:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23 3:18 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:27 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:40 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 4:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 5:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 5:17 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 4:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 5:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 6:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 16:53 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23 19:55 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-24 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:18 ` david
2009-07-24 22:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-24 22:46 ` david
2009-07-25 2:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 2:53 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-08-07 4:21 ` Jeff King
2009-07-24 22:54 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-24 22:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-07-24 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-26 17:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-26 17:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-24 23:46 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25 0:41 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-25 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-07-25 18:57 ` Timo Hirvonen
2009-07-25 19:06 ` Reece Dunn
2009-07-25 20:31 ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-25 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 23:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-26 16:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-26 7:54 ` Mike Hommey
2009-07-26 10:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-26 10:23 ` demerphq
2009-07-26 10:27 ` demerphq
2009-07-25 21:04 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 16:48 ` Anders Kaseorg
2009-07-23 19:03 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-23 0:23 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-07-23 2:25 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-26 23:21 George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0907251046140.3960@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=crmafra2@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox