From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for external programs for handling native fetches Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Daniel Barkalow , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Noonan X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 25 23:14:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MUoZq-0007FR-L8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:14:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752859AbZGYVOj (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:14:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752856AbZGYVOj (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:14:39 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54520 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414AbZGYVOj (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:14:39 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n6PLEXZI020126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:14:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n6PLEXxf026352; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:14:33 -0700 X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.959 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Steven Noonan wrote: > > But more importantly, how fast can your machine compile the kernel? > (without ccache or any "cheats" like that, of course) Without ccache? One minute. With ccache? 16 seconds. Linus