git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSL
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:18:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908051800030.3390@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908051545000.3390@localhost.localdomain>



On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Timings for "git fsck --full" on the git directory:
> 
>  - Mozilla SHA1 portable C-code (sucky sucky): MOZILLA_SHA1=1
> 
> 	real	0m38.194s
> 	user	0m37.838s
> 	sys	0m0.356s
> 
>  - This code ("half-portable C code"): BLK_SHA1=1
> 
> 	real	0m28.120s
> 	user	0m27.930s
> 	sys	0m0.192s
> 
>  - OpenSSL assembler code:
> 
> 	real	0m26.327s
> 	user	0m26.194s
> 	sys	0m0.136s

Ok, I installed the 32-bit libraries too, to see what it looks like for 
that case. As expected, the compiler is not able to do a great job due to 
it being somewhat register starved, but on the other hand, the old Mozilla 
code did even worse, so..

 - Mozilla SHA:

	real	0m47.063s
	user	0m46.815s
	sys	0m0.252s

 - BLK_SHA1=1

	real	0m34.705s
	user	0m34.394s
	sys	0m0.312s

 - OPENSSL:

	real	0m29.754s
	user	0m29.446s
	sys	0m0.288s

so the tuned asm from OpenSSL does kick ass, but the C code version isn't 
_that_ far away. It's quite a reasonable alternative if you don't have the 
OpenSSL libraries installed, for example.

I note that MINGW does NO_OPENSSL by default, for example, and maybe the 
MINGW people want to test the patch out and enable BLK_SHA1 rather than 
the original Mozilla one.

But while looking at 32-bit issues, I noticed that I really should also 
cast 'len' when shifting it. Otherwise the thing is limited to fairly 
small areas (28 bits - 256MB). This is not just a 32-bit problem ("int" is 
a signed 32-bit thing even in a 64-bit build), but I only noticed it when 
looking at 32-bit issues.

So here's an incremental patch to fix that. 

		Linus

---
 block-sha1/sha1.c |    4 ++--
 block-sha1/sha1.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block-sha1/sha1.c b/block-sha1/sha1.c
index 8fd90b0..eef32f7 100644
--- a/block-sha1/sha1.c
+++ b/block-sha1/sha1.c
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ void blk_SHA1_Init(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx)
 }
 
 
-void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *data, int len)
+void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *data, unsigned long len)
 {
 	int lenW = ctx->lenW;
 
-	ctx->size += len << 3;
+	ctx->size += (unsigned long long) len << 3;
 
 	/* Read the data into W and process blocks as they get full
 	 */
diff --git a/block-sha1/sha1.h b/block-sha1/sha1.h
index dbc719f..7be2d93 100644
--- a/block-sha1/sha1.h
+++ b/block-sha1/sha1.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ typedef struct {
 } blk_SHA_CTX;
 
 void blk_SHA1_Init(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx);
-void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *dataIn, int len);
+void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *dataIn, unsigned long len);
 void blk_SHA1_Final(unsigned char hashout[20], blk_SHA_CTX *ctx);
 
 #define git_SHA_CTX	blk_SHA_CTX

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-26 23:21 Performance issue of 'git branch' George Spelvin
2009-07-31 10:46 ` Request for benchmarking: x86 SHA1 code George Spelvin
2009-07-31 11:11   ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-07-31 11:31     ` George Spelvin
2009-07-31 11:37     ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-31 12:24       ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-07-31 12:29         ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-31 12:32         ` George Spelvin
2009-07-31 12:45           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-07-31 13:02             ` George Spelvin
2009-07-31 11:21   ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-31 11:26   ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-31 12:31   ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-31 13:27   ` Brian Ristuccia
2009-07-31 14:05     ` George Spelvin
2009-07-31 13:27   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-31 15:05   ` Peter Harris
2009-07-31 15:22   ` Peter Harris
2009-08-03  3:47   ` x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSL George Spelvin
2009-08-03  7:36     ` Jonathan del Strother
2009-08-04  1:40     ` Mark Lodato
2009-08-04  2:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04  2:51       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04  3:07         ` Jon Smirl
2009-08-04  5:01           ` George Spelvin
2009-08-04 12:56             ` Jon Smirl
2009-08-04 14:29               ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-08-18 21:50         ` Andy Polyakov
2009-08-04  4:48       ` George Spelvin
2009-08-04  6:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04  8:01           ` George Spelvin
2009-08-04 20:41             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-05 18:17               ` George Spelvin
2009-08-05 20:36                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-08-05 20:44                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-05 20:55                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-05 23:13                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  1:18                     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-08-06  1:52                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-08-06  2:04                         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-06  2:10                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  2:20                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-08-06  2:08                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  3:19                           ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  3:31                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  3:48                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  4:01                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  4:28                                   ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  4:50                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  5:19                                       ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  7:03                                         ` George Spelvin
2009-08-06  4:52                                 ` George Spelvin
2009-08-06  4:08                               ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  4:27                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-06  5:44                                   ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  5:56                                     ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06  7:45                                       ` Artur Skawina
2009-08-06 18:49                       ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-08-04  6:40         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-18 21:26     ` Andy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0908051800030.3390@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).