From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block-sha1: improved SHA1 hashing Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <4A7B1166.8020507@gmail.com> <4A7B2A88.2040602@gmail.com> <4A7B384C.2020407@gmail.com> <4A7B4D84.80906@gmail.com> <4A7B509A.5010405@gmail.com> <4A7B5F4C.30102@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailing List To: Artur Skawina X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 07 01:04:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZC0k-0007Nn-8M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:04:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756451AbZHFXEa (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:04:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753537AbZHFXE3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:04:29 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40211 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756134AbZHFXE3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:04:29 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n76N4Sef016476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:04:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n76N4RkJ002947; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:04:27 -0700 X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain In-Reply-To: <4A7B5F4C.30102@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.966 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Artur Skawina wrote: > > hmm, I might be able to try it on some old willamette, but my prescott's > mobo died, so i can't verify that right now. I think willamette and northwood are basically the same wrt shifters (and pretty much everything else too, for that matter). I think northwood is a shrink, and had an increased cache size (and higher frequencies). But I think core-wise, they're very similar. It was prescott that changed a lot (mostly for the worse - the shifter was one of the few upsides of prescott, although increased frequency often made up for the downsides). Linus