From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <4A8A552D.6020407@viscovery.net> <4A8A8661.5060908@gmail.com> <4A8AA511.1060205@gmail.com> <7v4os5gs0p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1vn9f4mz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk511dk11.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Brandon Casey , Junio C Hamano , Sebastian Schuberth , Artur Skawina , Johannes Sixt , msysGit , Git Mailing List To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 18 22:26:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MdVFy-0003ie-V8 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:26:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751616AbZHRU0B (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:26:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751515AbZHRU0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:26:00 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40394 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461AbZHRU0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:26:00 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n7IKPXdY029892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:25:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n7IKPWRu001751; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:25:32 -0700 X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.463 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED,PATCH_SUBJECT_OSDL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Does it really implement the gcc inline assembly syntax? A fair number of compilers do. The Intel compiler does too. The reason? The gcc inline asm is as close to a standard there is, and is fairly expressive without being the mess that is MSC. So if you do inline asm at all (and considering the target market for a C compiler, most do), gcc asm is a good thing to aim for. Linus