From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: distinguishing between staged and unstaged content in a stash?
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:24:14 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1710041121010.12084@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004150345.GC1667@alpha.vpn.ikke.info>
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:10:46AM -0400, rpjday@crashcourse.ca wrote:
> >
> > couple (admittedly trivial) questions about stashing. first, can
> > i clarify that when one stashes content, a stash *always*
> > distinguishes between what was staged, and what was unstaged? that
> > is, when one is stashing, the "--keep-index" option relates to
> > whether or not staged changes are left in the index (and,
> > consequently, in the working directory as well), but that option
> > has no effect on the final content of the stash, yes? even if
> > "--keep-index" is used, staged content still ends up in the stash.
> >
> > also, is there a simple way to distinguish between the staged
> > and unstaged contents of a stash (or, more basically, is this even
> > a useful question to ask)? out of curiosity, i tried to figure out
> > how to do this, and came up with the following.
> >
> > to see staged portion of stash@{0}:
> >
> > $ git show stash@{0}^2
> >
> > to see unstaged portion:
> >
> > $ git diff stash@{0}^2 stash@{0}
> >
> > it's not like i have a pressing need to do that, i was just
> > curious if there's a simpler way to do this, or if this is just
> > not something people should need to do on a regular basis.
>
> There was a recent thread about this[0]. The conclusion is that it's
> seen as a good change, someone just needs to supply the patch to do
> this. A possible solution was also provided (from before that
> thread) here [1]
>
> [0]:https://public-inbox.org/git/1505626069.9625.6.camel@gmail.com/
> [1]:https://public-inbox.org/git/20170317141417.g2oenl67k74nlqrq@sigill.intra.peff.net/
ah, i see immediately what sort of worm can this represents, given
the various possible states of files in the stash:
* staged and tracked
* unstaged and tracked
* untracked but not ignored
* untracked and ignored
i will continue reading.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 11:10 distinguishing between staged and unstaged content in a stash? rpjday
2017-10-04 15:03 ` Kevin Daudt
2017-10-04 15:24 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1710041121010.12084@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ikke.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).