From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: I don't want the .git directory next to my code. Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <478D79BD.7060006@talkingspider.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mike , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 16 13:12:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JF78L-0003bk-He for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:12:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752088AbYAPMMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:12:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752060AbYAPMMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:12:13 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54275 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751967AbYAPMMM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:12:12 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 12:12:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 13:12:10 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX181uU4RwTA17SaQJSo0LQOBOBVNnUPltqAgcH10Qw 9F3pWUNY2kyzEa X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > > >> Mike writes: > >> > >> > I'm learning git and I'm really annoyed that the .git directory > >> > lives in the same directory as my code. I don't want it there for > >> > three reasons: > >> > >> The idea was discussed here, mostly under the name "gitlink". > > > > It goes by "git worktree"; > > Any pointer to some doc? My git doesn't have a "worktree" command. I was not talking about a command. I prepended "git" only to stress that this worktree is not any worktree, but integrated into git. I believe Bill has already given all necessary pointers. > > has nothing to do with gitlink (which has something to do with > > submodules). > > We may not be talking about the same gitlink then. Indeed. Ciao, Dscho