From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git and binary files Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:42:57 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Symonds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petko Manolov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 16 14:43:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JF8YG-00030f-OS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:43:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752417AbYAPNnE (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:43:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752348AbYAPNnD (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:43:03 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36508 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751710AbYAPNnB (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:43:01 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 13:42:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 14:42:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+K2fpwXtmK4ZzRbgfKYkoGd7AcpJY2JWv96ethFM ylOPo+yVXYAvin X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Petko Manolov wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, David Symonds wrote: > > > If you don't care about versioning those files, why would you use a > > version control system? Just store them somewhere else, and use > > symlinks. > > That is certainly a way of doing it. However, it will be much simpler > and fast to be able to "git clone" and then "git pull" every once in a > while. The alternative involves "cp -a" or most likely "scp -r" the > binaries along with the repository and you can never be sure that both > are in sync. I think that you're missing the point of version control. It's not only about having an up-to-date source tree, but also about being able to go back to a certain revision. What you want is most likely covered by "rsync -au". Hth, Dscho