From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git and binary files Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:07:02 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Symonds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petko Manolov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 16 15:08:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JF8vW-0005EK-WD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:07:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752929AbYAPOHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:07:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752739AbYAPOHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:07:06 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55305 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752765AbYAPOHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:07:05 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 14:07:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 15:07:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Hlh8aUkbHprZ5+iHbh8uHEHI/HuSQKKmEjQSkfW UXGbTDYtd51yVD X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Petko Manolov wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > I think that you're missing the point of version control. It's not > > only about having an up-to-date source tree, but also about being able > > to go back to a certain revision. > > No contradiction here. In my case old source code will work perfectly > with new binaries/firmware. That's why i don't _need_ the history, only > the latest stuff in order to save space. No, you _do_ miss the point here. You might _think_ that they work perfectly, but with revision control you want to have _exactly_ the same setup. You want to be able to go back to a certain _revision_ (including the then-current firmware). And that's what you don't want. So git is not for you. Ciao, Dscho