From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:35:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <478E1FED.5010801@web.de> <65026F2B-5CE8-4238-A9AB-D3545D336B41@sb.org> <200801162251.54219.jnareb@gmail.com> <1574A90A-8C45-46AD-9402-34AE6F582B3F@sb.org> <7652B11D-9B9F-45EA-9465-8294B701FE7C@sb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kevin Ballard , Jakub Narebski , Mark Junker , git@vger.kernel.org To: Pedro Melo X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 17 01:35:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFIjN-0005pl-K1 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:35:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752668AbYAQAfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:35:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751701AbYAQAfL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:35:11 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:53156 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752638AbYAQAfK (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:35:10 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2008 00:35:08 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 01:35:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18r5Ihry0YrdPEQwDV8G0YiKHovZm5ozLzLTPz33C 0wEMcAMyz+uhvA X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Pedro Melo wrote: > The content of the file is sacred, we both agree on that. We disagree on > the filename, because for me it's more important that equal strings, > even if encoded to different byte sequences, should be treated as the > same file. Why should the filename be _stored_ normalised? I agree on the lookup, yes, but not the storage. Hth, Dscho