From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Add "--show-all" revision walker flag for debugging Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:12:42 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 02:13:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JO0l1-0006jC-Sh for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:13:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755989AbYBJBMm (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:12:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755988AbYBJBMl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:12:41 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57873 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755449AbYBJBMl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:12:41 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2008 01:12:39 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 10 Feb 2008 02:12:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+UfN4tUoaUrEltTPMW4HZ/C0LbV7WgJNC3nf55o/ FYxwKPni/TYSNx X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'm starting to free up some resources to look at the interesting > problem with screwed-up commit dates confusing our commit walker into > thinking that some uninteresting commit isn't actually uninteresting due > to not traversing the uninteresting chain deep enough. I was thinking the other night why I did not like the generation header. And I found out why: it is redundant information. So why not have some local "cache" which maintains the generation numbers for the commits? (Much like the "notes" cache I showed last year?) Hmm? Ciao, Dscho