From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove "nohup" from git-help--browse Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:06:54 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7vhcgkm7yy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1202502982-6822-1-git-send-email-dpotapov@gmail.com> <200802090653.43280.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20080209200351.GC30368@dpotapov.dyndns.org> <7vbq6p7emn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Dmitry Potapov , Christian Couder , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 03:07:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JO1bK-0007BC-J0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:07:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751964AbYBJCGx (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:06:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751926AbYBJCGw (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:06:52 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49175 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751919AbYBJCGw (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:06:52 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2008 02:06:50 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 10 Feb 2008 03:06:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XOTpD4fRXaYCvAxgXiUfC/9pD+RB4cdrLVuJThx nIr1xaV2WzZCHL X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vbq6p7emn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Dmitry Potapov writes: > > > So, I want to hear what other people think. If there is no objection, > > I will add this redirection. > > I personally feel that we should not hide output from the > backend browsers by redirection. Some may be chattier than > others, but then we would know against which browser to file bug > reports. > > Just my two yen. Yeah. If you do not like the chatty side, then there should be a way to configure a script which redirects stdout/stderr to be called in place of the browser binary. Just my two (rapidly losing) pound. Ciao, Dscho