From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Removing things from a repo that shouldn't be there Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <9e4733910802100915t56d0f63fh90c303b35f6af921@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailing List To: Jon Smirl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 18:39:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOG8j-0004Zj-CF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:38:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751336AbYBJRiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751270AbYBJRiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:19 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33363 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751195AbYBJRiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:19 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2008 17:38:17 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 10 Feb 2008 18:38:17 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/X5uhyvFLXIvGksY7bqRc2isv4NOj77V+izo4KoX 9uDCyOa70CvmtB X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <9e4733910802100915t56d0f63fh90c303b35f6af921@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Jon Smirl wrote: > In the lazy clone thread there is mention of a large, generated file > being checked into the tree. Let's say we have a tree like this and it > is ok to delete the generated file since it didn't really need to be > checked in. Is there a procedure to chase down all the revisions, delete > them, and then regenerate the commits to reflect the deletion? I don't > need this tool, I'm just wondering if there is a reasonable solution to > the problem. filter-branch. Ciao, Dscho