From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] repack vs re-clone Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:50:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , git mailing list To: Marco Costalba X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 11 20:52:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOegj-0001sC-Hw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758501AbYBKTun (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:50:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758824AbYBKTun (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:50:43 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46486 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758501AbYBKTum (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:50:42 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2008 19:50:39 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 11 Feb 2008 20:50:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/sN3VbeknsI2miYeefMWWtnIImzqVhoPxP4ezDTq QkDVq0XFuXmztN X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Marco Costalba wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008 7:45 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > "Marco Costalba" writes: > > > > > So it happens to be just faster to re-clone the whole thing by > > > upstream. > > > > So what you are doing is passing the work, unnecessary work I'd say, > > to some poor server. Not nice. > > To a poor net bandwidth I would say because cloning from zero just > downloads the packages. Not exactly. Remember, if you did not "repack" via clone, the server would spend less cycles _and_ bandwidth on you. Namely zero. Ciao, Dscho