From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] add--interactive: handle initial commit better Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:22:06 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <20080213101649.GA18444@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080213105051.GA26522@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080213112504.GA26627@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff King , "Rhodes, Kate" , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 13 14:22:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPHZR-0004Zi-Pt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:22:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752759AbYBMNWE (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752264AbYBMNWD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:03 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43465 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752153AbYBMNWA (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:00 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2008 13:21:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 13 Feb 2008 14:21:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+fOplggoCf7gWumh77lhcHGD1UIVXpWovUmI0+Ka 8fT7RiTlPzNvjz X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Jeff King wrote: > > > } > > > + if (!hashcmp(sha1, empty_tree.sha1)) > > > + return &empty_tree; > > > return NULL; > > > } > > > > Heh. This is cute. But it is also a bit hard to reference, no? I mean, > > you have to remember the SHA-1 of it... > > > > Maybe {} ? > > Or NULL? I was talking about a special handling: "{}" is not a valid refname. But "NULL" _is_. So I wanted to avoid that "NULL" explicitely. Ciao, Dscho