From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] sending errors to stdout under $PAGER Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:15:43 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7vbq6g90gy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080217144854.56fcb98d.froese@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Edgar Toernig X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 17 16:16:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQlFm-0004jI-Hv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:16:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755270AbYBQPPy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:15:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755725AbYBQPPy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:15:54 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56355 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754996AbYBQPPy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:15:54 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2008 15:15:52 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2008 16:15:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/bv/pap9nbm6fqH5ES+Jl48kJgRA+fOIt8nI9+5a KRErBRry8SX9bT X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20080217144854.56fcb98d.froese@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Edgar Toernig wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > + FILE *outto = (pager_in_use() ? stdout : stderr); > > + > > vsnprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), err, params); > > - fprintf(stderr, "%s%s\n", prefix, msg); > > + fprintf(outto, "%s%s\n", prefix, msg); > > > > What do people think? Have I overlooked any downsides? > > Wouldn't it be better/safer to redirect stderr to the pager > in the first place? > > [...] > > /* return in the child */ > if (!pid) { > dup2(fd[1], 1); > + dup2(fd[1], 2); > close(fd[0]); > close(fd[1]); > return; > } I like it. Ciao, Dscho