From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Introduce the .gitfile Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:12:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1203331463-13857-1-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <8c5c35580802180456s75c9f857of1f727aca4673374@mail.gmail.com> <8c5c35580802180601h5cf01c5h583458fee61caa7a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Lars Hjemli X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 18 15:13:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JR6jm-0003Ob-Ha for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:12:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750893AbYBROMS (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:12:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751130AbYBROMS (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:12:18 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37191 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750871AbYBROMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:12:17 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2008 14:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2008 15:12:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/fzSUhH4/fDSVAszDvoxYHZuIXG03aePi2TyDf3Y 6bnPpBxx3s+WH0 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580802180601h5cf01c5h583458fee61caa7a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote: > On Feb 18, 2008 2:31 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > In the case of patch "1/5 => 2/5", I would even have appreciated > > > > an interdiff... > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't think I understand what you mean by interdiff. > > > > The tool interdiff of patchutils is really nice: you can visualise > > what would be the diff between the state after applying the first > > patch, and the state after applying the second patch, without applying > > anything at all: > > > > $ interdiff > > Ok, that sounds useful (I was kind of confused since 'man interdiff' > gave me nothing: being on slackware I'm so spoiled with preinstalled > dev-tools that I see no point in consulting google ;). > > Something like this (possibly mangled by gmail)? Heh, thank you! The mangling does not matter, since this is purely for reviewing pleasure. Thanks, Dscho